Posts Tagged 'Subversion'

Cornerstone 1.1

News from the tools front: The Greatest SCM Client EVAR, Zennaware Cornerstone, is now up to version 1.1 with a whole big whack of fixes and new features. If you weren’t convinced by my reasoning for deciding to buy version 1.0, then take a look at the much more detailed review that Jade Ohlhauser has done here — but here’s the money quote:

In my first comparison I could see the advantages that Cornerstone had to offer, but it had flaws in the workflow I needed every day. Now that those flaws have been addressed, the comparison isn’t even close. I’m going with Cornerstone. Something we can all agree on is that the competition benefits everyone. Subjectively speaking, however, it seems to me that the Cornerstone developers have made more progress in the last 4 months than the Versions team has.

As an example of that progress, let us look at a recent exchange I had with the Cornerstone author, when I got mildly annoyed at the array of projects I wasn’t actively working on at the moment taking a while to update. Note the date and time on the email I sent –

Date: October 25, 2008 6:20:13 AM PDT (CA) Subject: Support Request Is there any way to turn off the working copy refresh on an individual basis instead of globally? If there isn’t, could I please put that in as a feature request? …

– and check out how long getting it sorted took.

Date: October 25, 2008 11:15:07 AM PDT (CA) Subject: Re: Support Request Hi Alex, I have implemented per-working copy refresh configuration for 1.1 which is currently at the release candidate stage and will be released in the next two weeks.Best regards,

Now you just can’t beat service like that. If you’re using Subversion, you owe it to yourself to get Cornerstone and make life easier on yourself!

Continue Reading →

SVN Smackdown! Cornerstone v. Versions

Like the rest of the world, we use Subversion for revision control here at Trollwerks by choice, and for the last few years we’ve been using svnX as our client. However, it’s getting a little long in the tooth now, so when it balked at reading the repositories of a project we’d been meaning to get back to for a while, we figured we’d take a look at two new native Mac clients that everyone’s getting all excited about and see if they merited switching to: the 1.02.59 release version of Zennaware Cornerstone


Continue Reading →

Issue tracking: Lighthouse Keeper

So, now that our first native iPhone app is off to beta testing (and that took quite long enough, didn’t it?) time to sort out what we’re going to do to formalize the issue tracking here at Trollwerks, which in the programming frenzy since our April inception has been … transcriptive, shall we say? … before any external issues become arisen.

We’re not really looking for much in the way of process here (at the moment, anyways) only personal organization, so our feature checklist is, oh look at that, empty. Unless you count ‘as low overhead as possible’ as a feature. But it’s more of a philosophy, really. One we strive to in every area of life, actually; after all, the one and only resource that’s truly finite is time. But we digress. (Oh, the irony!) So, getting back on track, what would low overhead imply for Our Perfect Issue Tracker?

First off, it implies no ongoing cost without clearly compelling justification. So we take your FogBugz and your JIRA and your whatever commercial offerings, and we summarily eliminate all of those, since there is no clearly compelling justification on the horizon.

Second off, it implies that we’re not going to be setting up and managing our own server if at all possible, because that’s a hassle. We’ve tried both local and remote setups of that at various places, and at the very best it’s been only intermittently annoying. So we take your Bugzilla and your Mantis and your whatever open source offerings, and we summarily eliminate all of those. Are we Linux geeks? We think not!

So that reduces our problem space immensely … since it gets rid of all widely used alternatives. Hmmm. Well, let’s look at it the other way then, what do we like in an issue tracker? And, y’know, there’s only one thing we’ve ever used that springs to mind; and that’s over ten years ago now, the Mac OS 7 native program “TestTrack”, which has grown up to become a real company since; but has completely lost the elegance and simplicity of a native Mac application with a single data file. (Multi-user control was “file locking.” Not the most scalable no, but very low overhead indeed!) We liked using that, and we haven’t liked any of the client-server systems we’ve used since.

Well, guess what? It’s not here now, but it’s promised that soon there’ll be a native app that looks like it has a good shot at displacing our pining for old school TestTrack. It’s called Lighthouse Keeper, and if there has ever been an issue tracking client that’s looked as good as this, we’ve certainly never heard of it:

So what is the “Lighthouse” that this is the Keeper of? We’d never heard of that one before. Turns out that it’s a hosted service that focuses on

well, beauty and simplicity, as they say. Now that sounds about right. As does what the Keeper author has to say:

I looked at the usual suspects: Trac, FogBugz, Mantis, Jira etc. None of them really clicked with me, they seemed to do too much or have overly complicated UIs. Lighthouse was different, it was designed to be simple. It didn’t try to be everything to everyone like some of the above. It let you file tickets, assign them to someone and then work your way through them. And most of all, it had an incredibly well designed UI.

Of course, I’m not exactly the biggest fan of web apps. They’re fine to use occasionally, but when it’s something you’re working with all day it’s frustrating to either have to keep logging in, or at least keep a Safari window open. Luckily the Lighthouse developers provided a pretty comprehensive API so I thought that I’d set about making a desktop client to get around this.

So that’s all looking pretty intriguing, and we thought we’d take a look at just what the Lighthouse pricing is, on the off chance that this might rise to the level of “clearly compelling justification” that we mentioned earlier. And guess what? They do have a free offering, not only for Open Source projects, but for private use as well, with restrictions that most likely aren’t going to chafe us in the near future. And hey, you just can’t get any lower overhead than a hosted service, can you now?

So there we are! A new issue tracking system to try out, which we’d thoroughly recommend to your attention as well if you subscribe to the same minimalist aesthetic we do. Once Lighthouse Keeper makes its way onto our desktop, we’ll be sure and let you know how this experiment progresses!


While we still like Lighthouse, if you’re looking for a self-hosted bug tracking system, Bugify sure looks sweet!

17 Bug and Issue Tracking Apps for Developers

Continue Reading →