Here’s a handy open-source application for the busy little iPhone programmer:
AppReviews is a tool for iPhone and iPod touch developers, allowing you to keep track of how your applications are being reviewed and rated by users across all of the iTunes App Stores worldwide…
AppReviews is open-source, the source code is available on github. You will require a copy of the iPhone SDK from Apple in order to compile the source code.
Very helpful, very nice, this fellow couldn’t get Apple to approve it so he open sources it … but wait! The plot thickens!
Today I discovered that there is a recent app in the App Store also called AppCritics, which also scrapes review data from the AppStore. I was doubly shocked by this because:
1) I submitted my AppCritics to the AppStore on 30th November 2008 and it was finally rejected in January 2009 because it scrapes data using a non-public web API (the same API iTunes uses). So how come this new app gets approved when it does the same thing?
2) I thought that I “owned” the name AppCritics in the AppStore because I still have the rejected app in my iTunes app listing, with a button that says “Resubmit Binary”. So how can someone else come along and submit an app with the same name, that does the same thing, and get approved?
This is yet another example of how inconsistent and poorly run the App Store still is.
I am emailing Apple about this matter now, I doubt that I will get any meaningful response beyond some canned auto-reply. In the meantime I will be renaming my AppCritics to AppReviews instead.
Heh. On the one hand, at least he GOT a rejection, instead of 110+ days in limbo like our Forgotten Project™, but really, approving an app that does the same thing with the same name … now, that’s just rubbing salt into the wounds, isn’t it?
h/t: LinkedIn – Cocoa Touch!